Rideshare Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
In litigation
Mass-tort payouts ($50k+)
mass_tort · consumer_product
Rideshare passenger sexual-assault MDL 3084 (Uber) + California JCCP (Lyft) - active intake
Eligibility hint
Were a passenger in an Uber or Lyft when an incident involving driver sexual or physical assault occurred
MDL No. 3084 in the Northern District of California consolidates Uber passenger sexual-assault cases before Judge Charles Breyer; Lyft cases are coordinated separately in California state court. Uber's own US Safety Reports counted 9,805 sexual-assault reports across 2017-2020 (including 464 reports of rape); Lyft disclosed 4,158 reports between 2017-2019. Allegations center on inadequate driver background checks, missing in-app safeguards, and ignored prior reports. Bellwether trials anticipated 2026-2027.
Recent signals
- Lawsuit claims Uber failed to stop dangerous driver before he slammed into woman’s car in Beverly Hills - KTLA
- Jury Rejects Lawsuit Filed by Uber Driver, Passenger Injured in Chicago Police Pursuit - WTTW News
- Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit | June 2026 Litigation Update - Lawsuit Information Center
- Rideshare drivers sue Uber over being kicked off app in new challenge to California law - CalMatters
- Attorney General Schwalb Joins Lawsuit Against Uber Over Deceptive Subscription Practices - OAG DC (.gov)
- Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits - Consumer Notice
- Uber faces class action for allegedly misleading riders with inaccurate arrival times - Class Action Lawsuits
- AG Yost Joins Multistate Lawsuit Against Uber for Deceptive Subscription Practices - Ohio Attorney General (.gov)
- New lawsuit alleges Uber is violating drivers’ rights. Here’s how - Los Angeles Times
Brands:
uber technologieslyftuber
Products: uberlyftridesharepassenger assault
Products: uberlyftridesharepassenger assault
Think this might apply to you?
Take a 30-second audit and we'll match every brand you've used against active settlements.